Sunday, January 24, 2010

Globalization, The World is Flat

“…if you are an American, you better be good at the touchy-feely service stuff, because anything that can be digitized can be outsourced to either the smartest or the cheapest producer, or both. (15)”

This sentence from one of Friedman’s interviews defines many elements of market globalism. It is as if saying, “we see it (‘it’ being opportunity, value, money, etc.) and we’re coming to get it because we can do it cheaper.” Unfortunately, many Americans know this all to well as their jobs have been outsourced because they can be done cheaper and more efficiently overseas. Often we think of these jobs being higher-end/tech jobs (and now surgeries as seen in “Outsourcing Your Heart”), however, as noted in the Friedman text, drive-thru windows are being outsourced from communities to a central (American, for now) location. How much longer until these jobs are sent overseas? These entry level positions at local fast food restaurants are what keep some students out of trouble, and are a major source of funding for many families where parents either do not work, or are non-existent. This is a problem; however, market globalism does not address this…market globalism overlooks the person, as the decision comes down to “where can we keep our expenses to a minimum?”

The five claims to market globalism are true to an extent, and really depend on perspective. For example, claim four notes that “globalization benefits everyone.” Does it? Try to explain that to the mother of three who has a degree in accounting, has held a job with an American company for 20 years and then has it outsourced to India. Globalization does not benefit her. Globalization does not benefit the teenagers mentioned above in the McDonalds scenario. However, globalization does benefit companies that are able to reduce expenses and increase profit margins. Additionally, the phenomenon benefits countries to which the jobs are outsourced. So, in all, it comes down to one’s perspective on the situation.

Claim one states, “globalization is about the liberalization and global integration of markets.” Several times in the Friedman text he mentions that “the playing field is being leveled.” In essence, by leveling the playing field, we are bringing people/markets together. By having call-centers in other countries, parts being made cheaply in other locations, etc. goods are remaining affordable, and even becoming cheaper. Markets around the world are embracing the “you scratch my back, I’ll scratch yours” model in that, you provide us cheap labor, we’ll bring our business to you and keep prices down for consumers.

Claim 2 reads, “globalization is everywhere and irreversible.” Due to market globalism and the drive for higher profits, this is undoubtedly true. Companies are able to be more efficient and increase their bottom line, why would they ever want to reverse this? One of the most interesting quotes from the Friedman article (p. 45), summarized a UBS commercial that said, “we are in two locations, everywhere, and right next to you.” Globalization has made this true, with the flattening of the world and instant access to phone, internet, and media, nearly everything is everywhere and right next to you, simultaneously.

5 comments:

  1. Chris,
    As you've probably gathered, outsourcing is a sore spot for me. Lately, however, I've been doing some research on some companies that have not only survived but thrived in this market economy. The first one that comes to mind is American Efird, a thread company. AE began outsourcing some work in the last decade. During that same period, however, they developed partnerships with three industries based in China. Hence, they actually developed a foothold in the global economy. AE is certainly one example of a company that has morphed to meet the demands of a changing economy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree that outsourcing can definitely be a sore spot for many people. I think a lot depends on perspective. The unemployment rate in Cleveland County topped out around 15%...of course not all was due to outsourcing, but some was. It is hard to see so may people lose their jobs, because we see it affect so many students at school and in the community. However, I do agree that outsourcing can be positive in some aspects!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Steger's point in stating his claims was that these are the things market globalists want us to believe, not that they are necessarily true. It is because people buy into this ideology so readily that it has developed the strong discourse it has.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The promising statement was the fact that we can't outsource a haircut? :) Time for a new trade. I posted a new topic on the Hickory 2 Discussion Board that wraps up the outsourcing we see all around us. While it is taken from the American perspective, there is truth to it. At the same time, America is one of the more dominant powers at this point in time. This may be changing faster than we realize!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is the part of economic globalization that bothers me the most. Humans become a commodity that can be bought or sold for the benefit of the corporation. Yes Freidman says we all benefit from the residual sales. He forgets that only those working in the residual fields are able take advantage. I would like for him to come visit our Adult Basic Education center and see the folks who are 50+ years old, out of work, and have no marketable skills because their skill set was outsourced.

    ReplyDelete